[A viewer writes in, responding to the short video above:]
It has actually been reported that the number is now closer to 6,000 [peaceful protestors killed in the streets]. My people have had enough. We cannot stop now. If we do, the revenge this regime will unleash would be far more devastating. What would be the point anyway? To stop only to die of starvation?
Iran will never be Syria. The majority of Iranians are done with Islam. They see anything associated with Islam as a symbol of their colonizers, which explains the mosque burnings. We also have a clear alternative: Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who over the past 45 years has consistently preached the same message through his advocacy, that power should come from the people. His actions have perfectly reflected the ideology he has promoted all these years. As he gained more popularity, he began taking more decisive actions. This has led to what we see today: people chanting his name, calling for his return, and now hearing him give direct guidance on reclaiming our beloved Iran.
I used to watch your content frequently a long time ago, and since I am somewhat familiar with your political views, I thought I would let you know about one of the most popular chants on the streets right now. It symbolizes that people have learned their lesson from everything that went wrong in 1979.
“Death to the three corrupt: the Mullah, the Leftist, and the Mojahed.”
These are the three forces that ruined Iran through the fusion of Islamism and Communism, the Red and Black alliance. It mirrors what is happening today in the West.
Lastly, I want to end with a story from the Shahnameh by Ferdowsi, the greatest work of Persian literature ever written. Simorgh, also known as the Phoenix in Persian mythology, must die and turn into ashes so that she can rise again stronger than before. Sometimes, that is the only way.
For years, I heard many Iranians, myself included at times, criticize Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi. We said he should have been a dictator, as people wrongly labeled him, and that instead of leaving the country and refusing to rule through fear or turn against his own people, he should have crushed the protests. But with everything that has unfolded, I cannot help but wonder if it was necessary to suffer for 47 years so that Iranians could finally move on from a religion that colonized them 1,400 years ago. It is a tragic idea to accept, but perhaps this was the Phoenix story of the Iranian people.
May you come and visit a free Iran sooner rather than later.
—Javid Shah
—————
Quote, "The majority of Iranians are done with Islam." You're telling me that more than 50% of the population of Iran is atheist (not Buddhist, presumably) and willing to fight a war against Islam? You're telling me that more than 45 million Iranians (out of 90 million or more) are anti-Islamic? When you go out in the countryside and talk to the poor: the majority of those people are willing to work with Israel and with America against their own government… for this reason? Really? Does that sound falsifiable to you?
—————
@a-bas-le-ciel I mean, the best poll we have comes from the GAMAAN Institute and was conducted in 2020 under the title “Iranians’ Attitudes Toward Religion.” It showed that 60 percent of Iranians no longer identify as Muslim. They are not atheists, even though I wish they were. Most still believe in a God, just not a religious one. This poll was conducted before the Mahsa Amini uprising and the current revolution, so I would wager that the number is even higher today. I want to reiterate that I am not claiming the poll is perfect, but it is the best evidence we currently have, aside from the Islamic Republic’s own fabricated statistics, where people are automatically labeled Shia in their passports at birth. I would post the link, but YouTube would likely block my comment, so just search the title along with the word GAMAAN and it will come up.
Other polls also show a significant rise in parents choosing Iranian names over Arabic names for their children, as well as a growing abandonment of Islamic traditions in favor of Iranian ones such as Nowruz, the Iranian New Year, over the past 47 years. All of these trends point in the same direction.
Aside from that, I was born and lived in Iran for 18 years before moving to Canada. I can speak from personal experience, and in my opinion, once the regime falls, Iran is about to become the true capital of what many would call Islamophobia. We are all anxiously waiting to see how this plays out, especially within the diaspora.
To answer your question directly, Iranians do not need to fight a war against Islam. My point is that I genuinely believe the fight is already over and that most people have already moved on. I emphasize the word most because there will still be a portion of the population that remains Muslim, but they will be a minority.
Lastly, yes, I truly believe there is no force Iranians despise more intensely than the Islamic Republic. I think the majority of the population is willing to work with Israel and the United States. I have followed Iranian politics for years, and believe me when I say that Trump and Netanyahu have an unsettling number of devoted fans in Iran, more than you would even find in Israel or America. The political views that emerge from Iran after the fall of this regime are going to shock the West. I understand how extreme this may sound to someone not closely following Iranian politics, but maybe in a few months or a year I will comment on one of your videos and say, “I told you so.”
—————
Re: "It showed that 60 percent of Iranians no longer identify as Muslim." I think you are profoundly misinterpreting the situation —and you may well be gamble with your own life on the basis of this misinterpretation. Re: "I have followed Iranian politics for years, and believe me when I say that Trump and Netanyahu have an unsettling number of devoted fans in Iran, more than you would even find in Israel or America." We will see precisely how many (or how few) are now willing to prove this in a civil war: it is one thing to passively say you support Caesar and another thing to fight and die for the future of an illusion.
—————
@a-bas-le-ciel I saw that you made a post about my comment. Thank you for taking the time to respond. I genuinely appreciated much of what you had to say about nihilism, as that was the kind of content I originally followed you for. It always bothered me that whenever someone says they are a nihilist, the immediate response is, “Oh, so you must be depressed.” Society as a whole seems unable to recognize the clear distinction between atheism and nihilism, even though, as you pointed out, nihilism rejects all beliefs, not just belief in a deity. I also appreciated your discussion of how nihilism can be used as a tool or framework to improve one’s life. In addition, I enjoyed your content on debunking and discussing determinism, especially the salt crystal analogy you used.
The reason I specifically referenced that particular chant is that, if I remember correctly, you grew up in a communist household and you have a profound dislike for that ideology. I used that chant because I thought you would be able to relate to the struggle of my people who are suffering under the very ideas you oppose on a personal level, ideas that have devastated my beloved Iran for the past 47 years.
I do not think I am misrepresenting the situation. Iranians are extremely patriotic, and many of us are willing to die for Iran. I do not know if you can fully grasp what I am feeling, but there is a burning jealousy inside me that I am not in Iran right now, fighting alongside my compatriots to reclaim the land of Cyrus the Great. I was 11 years old when I left my house without my parents knowing to participate in the Green Movement protests. Those protests also turned violent. If I could press a button and be there right now, I would do it without hesitation.
You also said that many people are willing to die for what you call an illusion. First of all, it is not an illusion, or if you believe it is, that claim needs to be demonstrated. Iran is not Iraq, Afghanistan, or Syria. The culture, population, and collective will of the people are fundamentally different. Even if I grant that point for the sake of argument, I do not think you fully grasp how dire the situation in Iran truly is. People have been dying for years as a result of this government’s policies and incompetence. Fewer than ten percent of the population supports the regime, and there are polls that reflect this reality as well.
People are dying because they cannot access the medicine they need. They are dying due to poor road management and car accidents. They are dying from poverty, from pollution, and from countless other systemic failures. The number of casualties from these causes is far greater than what we are seeing right now. The difference is that until recently, it was all just numbers. Numbers do not spark emotion. But when people see actual bodies as the result of the regime’s cruelty, those numbers become human, and that reality deeply disturbs anyone who witnesses it.
Before this revolution, a video went viral in Iranian media showing a father crying because he could not afford to buy a bicycle for his daughter. He did not know how to explain that to her or how to cope with the pain and helplessness of it. It is the kind of moment that, when you see it, awakens something inside you as a human being.
The country is slowly dying. If this regime remains in power, we won’t have any water to drink soon. Our environment is being destroyed, and our ports and national assets are being sold off to the CCP.
So when you tell me that people are fighting and dying for the future of an illusion, you are not fully grasping the depth of suffering under this regime. People are willing to fight for the possibility of a better future because even the hope of something better, even if you choose to call it an illusion, is far preferable to the reality they are living through now.
By the way, if you ever wanted to discuss Iran on a Discord call or something, I’m up for it.
—————
I have been very sick, but when I'm healthy enough to get on camera, I'll record a further video about this: I am not opposed to civil war, I am opposed to pretending that peaceful protest can accomplish the same things as a civil war —and I am opposed to delusional optimism about the body count entailed by a civil war —and I am cautioning the audience (in parallel to Syria) as to just how undemocratic (and un-secular) the outcomes of the civil war may be. This video is less than three minutes long: it leaves many things unsaid. To have a government in Iran that forces the population to accept (i) the theory of evolution and (ii) the workplace equality of women and overt homosexuals… what would be the body count for that? What would be a realistic estimate of how much violence would be required to bring about that social transformation? The French Revolution was reversible: many of those people died fighting for the future of an illusion —although for a few short years it seemed to be real.
