[A member of the audience writes in reply to my short video titled, Anti-Racism: Perception and Action:]
I think the real issue is that skin color doesn't tell you anything meaningful about a person's character, which is the only thing that matters. The degree to which anyone else believes your skin color defines you of course changes the way they treat you, but this is a false belief, since race is a social construct rather than a biological reality. Realizing this is as close as we can get to being colorblind, but since there are still people who believe the mirage, we are stuck navigating that regardless.
[And I reply:]
No, you're making two incompatible points: (1) "I think the real issue is that skin color doesn't tell you anything meaningful about a person's character, which is the only thing that matters." (2) "…race is a social construct rather than a biological reality."
Point two is nonsensical if you profoundly understand point one: skin color is a biological reality but is not salient to judgements made about a person's character —it is "real but irrelevant". It would be deeply incoherent to then try to argue that it is unreal and a social construct: in parallel, it wouldn't liberate anyone to argue that homosexuality is unreal and a social construct.
As a further —even more absurd— parallel: it doesn't liberate anyone to argue that veganism is biologically unreal and merely "a social construct". The cultural concept of veganism is different in China, America and Israel today, and a human being could reasonably say that these cultural assumptions are "socially constructed" in some sense, but it is utterly absurd to claim that veganism as such, sensu stricto, is a biologically unreal social construct. Likewise, cultural assumptions surrounding homosexuality are different from place to place, etc.
There is a biological difference between beef and tofu; there is a scientifically, objectively real difference between a vegan and a non-vegan —and, likewise, there is a scientifically, objectively real difference between someone who never drinks alcohol and someone who regularly does —and this difference is ultimately rooted in the biological difference between alcohol and orange juice. If there were no chemically real difference between alcohol and water, and if there were no biologically real difference between the effect of alcohol and the effect of water on your brain and body, this whole line of reasoning would be ridiculous.
Is there some great step taken forward for human equality if we say that the effects of alcohol are "biologically unreal" and is merely "a social construct"? Perhaps the relationship between cholesterol and heart attacks is similarly relativistic?
My video (Anti-Racism: Perception and Action) already made this point: disregarding differences does not overcome them, but deepens them. We do not make progress —and we do not liberate anyone— by pretending that these differences do not exist. What is shallow let us regard as shallow and what is profound let us regard as profound.