Wednesday, 1 April 2026

Austin Vegan writes in to the channel.

[Austin Vegan writes:]

I’ve been vegan for over 9 years and into environmentalism/ecology for even longer. Being in those spaces, I’ve interacted with many people on the left and far left while considering myself more “moderate” or “apolitical.” That said, my political leanings are not only considered “right wing” by the majority of vegans, but often far right, or even treated as if they’re akin to being a “nazi.”

The reality is, my views have remained largely consistent over those years. I’m still vegan. Still an environmentalist. Still an atheist. What has changed is the ideological climate around these spaces. The nature of this certain brand of leftism that has taken hold is to continually move the goalpost as to what is deemed “moral,” and of course acceptable. Views that would have once been seen as normal, nuanced, or just outside the dominant current are now framed as evil, dangerous, or beyond discussion.

I’m at the point of really trying to distance veganism from leftism as far as possible, even refraining from alluding to discrimination and speciesism in educating people. Not because those concepts are totally without value, but because they immediately pull the conversation into a broader ideological framework that I don’t think is necessary, and often does more to alienate than persuade. The case against exploiting animals does not require buying into an entire left-wing worldview, yet veganism is constantly packaged that way, to its own detriment.

In the context of comedy, leftism is virtually incompatible at face value. Comedy provides relief from the suffering in life. It makes light of the absurdity of reality. It plays with tension, contradiction, and discomfort in a way that allows people to process what would otherwise just crush them. A worldview that moralizes everything, polices tone, and treats irreverence itself as suspect cannot coexist comfortably with real comedy. Comedy requires room to breathe. It requires a tolerance for imperfection, for offense, for things landing badly sometimes. Without that, you don’t get comedy, you get sterile ideological performance masquerading as humor.

And what makes it worse is that these same leftist comedians will often feel emboldened to join in the jew-hate only when it aligns with the group-think of the day, “Israel bad,” “free Palestine,” and the like. Not because they arrived there through careful thought, principle, or moral consistency, but because it is socially rewarded within their circles. Their morality is shaped far less by independent reasoning than by mimicry, social pressure, and a constant need to remain aligned with whatever emotional and political consensus is dominant at the moment. Criticizing Israel is one thing. Sliding into outright hostility toward Jews because it has become fashionable in certain circles is another.

—————

[My reply, FWIW:]

Re: "I’m at the point of really trying to distance veganism from leftism as far as possible…" —there's a significant precedent in the rise and fall of New Atheism as an internet phenomenon. It's difficult to remember this now, but the people who identified as atheists (during a brief period of time when money and fame could be had through talking about atheism) really could not deal with the separation of atheism from Communism, specifically, and leftism, generally. I don't think this example has predictive power for what happens next in veganism, it's just an instructive example from the past. https://youtu.be/PjjiQDDQFZA

Tuesday, 31 March 2026

Antisemitism in Stand Up Comedy: Emptying Out the Left.


LINK: https://youtu.be/Yz8Bhqj5rYA

Available both on Youtube and as a podcast, not just on Spotify but… wherever podcasts are "sold".

Thursday, 26 March 2026

Alcoholism and environmentalism are one.

Torn from the comment section of my own youtube channel.

—————

[SolarSolWaves writes:]

Yeah basically 95% of my observing of people referencing the Dunning Kruger effect is just like any other thought terminating cliche. 

Examples include in discussions like, "I wonder why X person did Y action?" response: "Dunning Kruger effect" ( = discouraging curiosity / cognitive emapthy / true understanding). 

Or often times people act like they mic‑dropping an reductio ad absurdum with the, "this argument is stupid dude you got the Dunning Kruger effect".

Regarding the stuff about people being competent enough to read, etc…

I think it starts with the fact that we intellectually trust way too much. When I was a kid, I genuinely thought medicine was basically “solved.” That’s how it was presented to us. The whole cultural vibe was: we know everything. 

And then you actually get hit with a real medical issue that isn’t run‑of‑the‑mill, and suddenly you see what’s really up. Doctors aren’t curious, doctors don’t like saying “I don’t know,” so they default to “it’s psychological” or whatever. Boom, the illusions start breaking.

Anyway, seems like we instill that same blind trust into all of science (really, pop-scientific journalists). So when people read a headline, they assume it’s true. That’s where it begins. Instilled intellectual trust.

Then we grow older, values emerge, stiffen, etc... then it becomes about biases and what we want to be true. A headline is assumed correct if we like what it says. If we don’t like it, then suddenly we’re “critical thinkers” again... we read the article, try to debunk it, or just throw some generic phrases in the comments to dismiss it.

Then some people become anti-science and have a blind trust in the anti-science people.

Yesterday there was this awful study posted on Reddit about how “eating eggs actually improves your good cholesterol,” and it had tons of upvotes. So I’m like… okay, interesting, let me read this. I’m vegan, but not for health reasons. Fact: veganism is healthy. Is it the healthiest diet ever? I don’t know, I don’t care. Point is, I don’t feel attacked when evidence comes out that some animal product might be healthy. I’m open-minded. People smoke cigarettes. Veganism being the healthiest diet in the world isn't going to move it forward. 

So I read the article... not the actual study, just one of those shitty website summaries (because that's what was linked / posted), and it took me maybe 30 seconds to see the massive flaw in the study design. […] [Details omitted.]

Simple shit. Yet the post had tons of upvotes, and the comments were like, “Yeah I eat 3 eggs a day, my LDL is fine.”

I dunno, it’s like, the average person is incompetent at reading scientific studies, but at the very least, why can’t journalists be competent? Why do we have journalists pumping out garbage like this? I know the answer, it’s rhetorical, but still, I feel like the solution has something to do with journalists and holding them accountable... fuck like uhh, in Mexico they have this new law where children's cereal cannot have colorful characters and avatars like Tony the Tiger and Captain Crunch on the boxes if it passes a sugar threshold. Boxes gotta be empty, ugly (like cigarette carton laws in Canada, except without the deathly images), or they can have the saturated graphic designs but only if its a low-sugar version of the cereal. Let's get some anti-click-bait anti-sensationalism laws going!!! Not sure if thats an idea worth taking too seriosuly, just thought of it now...   

I have friends who can’t read scientific papers or evaluate methodology or statistics. I can’t expect them to. I don't think this is a run-of-the-mill skill, and I don’t think it ever could be. Most people don't have the time  / cognitive energy left to. I'm lucky enough that I enjoy reading. Maybe I’m not giving people enough credit, but something about scientific journalism needs to change. I’ve made like seven Reddit comments in the past year debunking crap articles that people in the comments were eating up. One was pro-vegan but still a terrible study. One was about language sonority and humidity. One was about pole dancing being a mental-health miracle. A few more I can’t even remember.

—————

[And I reply:]

I'm surprised that you and I agree about so many things (we are in a minority within the vegan movement, you and I… and the vegan movement itself is a tiny minority to begin with) but it all comes down to a question of, "What now, what next?"  I chose _NOT_ to spend my life debunking antidepressants, I chose _NOT_ to spend my life denouncing the excuses made for smoking marijuana, two examples that rely on similar pseudoscience, two examples that show the extent to which people who are ruining their lives with self-inflicted brain damage will self-righteously insist that you are morally evil for making them aware of this inconvenient truth.  There is very little scientific complexity to carbon PPM measurements, and very little political complexity to the question of what must be done to redress them.  The species, on the whole, is stuck in a cycle of living a lie, eventually dying for the sake of that lie.  Alcoholism and environmentalism are one.

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

One rain falls. Each vine grows in its own direction.

Torn from the pages of the /abasleciel/ reddit.

—————

[Tempeh-Reborn writes:]

Hey Tempeh here (again) I see Eisel is back.

Egh I been on a new years resolution to not be a troll anymore, better for the soul. So not going to do that anymore. I talked enough shit to last me the next 5 years.

We haven't got a life update since you got banned from youtube..? Something I recall was you were working to become a fitness instructor?

Then you like moved to the Artic circle.. Nova Scotia or something like that.... going to go study Latin I think?

Yeah wtf... you were posting that you were like on death doorstep too and super vague about it. Whats up with Melissa is it over or what?

Give us some man behind the screen stuff.. Whats the plan... Who do you want to be 5 years from now?

It's cool if you hate me i probably would too.

Also any particular reason you came back and start posting bunch of stuff defending yourself all of a sudden? I don't blame you... more like it seems some of the stuff you posted online (and our commentary) might have had some negative life impacts. i.e banned from comedy clubs etc etc.

Not trolling I find you fascinating some good ways alot of bad ways. Want to know whats up last year or 2 you don't seem to have any objection of putting all the personal details public so give us an update.

Also my attempt to be an intellectual..... I don't really remember but obv big part of your work is criticizing the vegan movement. There was some lesson or something (I don't even remember what they were) you were trying to get across to vegans ideas from I think it was mothers against drunk driving.... Banning cigarettes public places etc.

So.. hot topic now is Israel with recent events... It seems the public perception of Israel especially on the right in the US is drastically changing to negative... Not the Nazi Wing but the "main stream youtube right" sort of people.

I know the anti Israel people say a lot of nonsense and probably have the same issues the vegan movement has... but... it seems there is a massive shift on this issue even with all the issues they have. Maybe the vegans can learn something? Or I am totally wrong and need to do some active research.

—————

Re: "Egh I been on a new years resolution to not be a troll anymore…"

My new year's resolution is to stop quoting Bob Dylan.

Re: "We haven't got a life update since you got banned from youtube..?"

I think life updates appear in pretty much each and every single thing I upload, en passant.

This includes updates about the series of crippling health conditions I've been through in the last two years or so.

Re: "Something I recall was you were working to become a fitness instructor?"

Yes, I took a course to become accredited as a gym employee of some kind (personal training and group classes… although each group class requires its own certification, supplemental to the course I took). It's a difficult question of, "How can I do something positive that contributes to this culture that I happen to be a part of?"

Ancient Latin, for example, is not the answer: that is something that would benefit nobody other than myself, as discussed recently on the channel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62ICn1h77mU

Re: "Not trolling I find you fascinating some good ways alot of bad ways."

One rain falls. Each vine grows in its own direction.

You can quote me on that. In fact, you have my permission to put it on a t-shirt. ;-)

Re: "It seems the public perception of Israel especially on the right in the US is drastically changing to negative..."

Or, in other words, Conservatives are "catching up" with the Left: anti-Israel sentiment now unites the mainstream left and the mainstream right, whereas it differentiated the two before —even if the motivations for the left and right (in opposing Israel) are different.

My very short book, Blood in the Snow, that you can read for free, on the internet, if you don't want to buy it on paper, contains several blunt statements about the politics of Israel, even in "the blurb" visible on Amazon.

"We are taught that under totalitarianism everyone lives in fear, whereas in a democracy we should all be quite relaxed, but this is the opposite of the truth: under a totalitarian government you may relax in knowing that everything is someone else's problem --you have no sense of political responsibility. The Israelis must live with the agony of knowing that the massacres committed for them are also committed by them: they are responsible, democratically. And the result is constant fear: it is a kind of fear you cannot imagine because you've never lived in a democracy. This is the moral reality of democracy, and just like the Roman Empire, the massacres never end: the process of conquest, internally and externally, is infinite. We endure tyranny like the changes in the weather, but we endure democracy knowing that we ourselves are the weather: there is a unique kind of moral dread in drowning, knowing that we are the flood."

https://www.amazon.com/nihilismo-como-filosof%C3%ADa-moral-philosophie/dp/B0GRGP2TDZ

I'm assuming you don't want to read it in Russian translation. ;-) That is available, separately. ;-)

I devoted a great deal of time to the consequences of the George Floyd protests: why? Because that controversy demonstrates the ways in which people (most people, in this culture, in this era) are incapable of understanding democracy —and are intellectually incapable of participating in it. Something similar can be said about the democratic opposition to Israel —although, of course, we're talking about war and peace, religion and atheism, instead of police and education reform.

Polyamory in the Library, Nihilism in the Bedroom.

Now on Youtube, as never before.

LINK: https://youtu.be/82QBmFfxnuo

Intellectual honesty and sexual infidelity.