What if I can prove that these are false allegations?
What if the enforcement system is rigged?
Welcome! Your Case ID is 4-4615000039678. Refer to this if you need to contact us again.
Hi my name is Leigh, how are you doing today? [11:16 PM]
Hello Leigh.
Hi there.
At the end of conversation number 4-1747000039900 the youtube employee told me that I could speak to "a supervisor" —I asked to speak with someone at a higher level of management.
Thanks for sharing your concern.
I understand that you're concerned about the status of your channel.
I would like to speak with someone at a higher level of management now. That was promised to me at the end of conversation number 4-1747000039900 (and the the youtube employee suddenly ended the conversation).
I know how important it is for you to have this issue sorted out. No worries, I got you and I'm more than willing to check this out for you.
Quote, "I understand that you're concerned about the status of your channel."
Not really.
I have a very carefree and jovial existence, to be honest.
Quote, "I know how important it is for you to have this issue sorted out."
Let's be honest: it's not really very important at all, is it?
😉
I understand where you are coming from, let's get the bottom of this.
Great.
There is already a lot of information in that earlier conversation, number 4-1747000039900
Do you have any questions for me?
I'm checking the details here.
But before we proceed, just a quick verification. Is this the channel in question?
https://www.youtube.com/heijinzhengzhi
Correct. That is my main youtube channel. Thank you for your time and consideration.
But this channel is active.
Correct: it was deleted (banned) and then undeleted (unbanned) within the last year.
Thanks for confirming the channel.
Let me check the details here.
Can I put this chat on hold for 3-5 minutes while I check this for you?
I am happy to wait, Leigh.
Thanks. I'll be right back.
Thanks for patiently waiting. Are we still connected?
I'm here, and happy to continue.
Thanks for confirming.
I am very sorry to hear about your experience and how frustrating this must be for you, especially given the history with your channel.
I'm not frustrated at all!
I understand that you feel your channel is being targeted and that the policy enforcements are a result of intentional misconduct.
Please know that all content is reviewed against our Community Guidelines by a combination of trained human reviewers and automated systems to ensure fairness and consistency. These decisions are made based on the content itself, not on any personal factors.
I am a carefree and jovial person, you know:
I upload comedy videos.
Leigh, I will remind you that I began this conversation by providing you with the case number linking to an earlier conversation:
that (earlier) conversation concluded with the promise that I would be allowed to talk to someone from a higher level of management.
I am asking for you to keep that promise now.
While I cannot comment on the alleged misconduct of other team members, I can confirm as per your last conversation, my colleague have forwarded your case to our supervisors and kindly wait for their response within 24 hours.
I cannot speak with a manager or a supervisor now?
And I can see here that you already have an existing case with one of our managers here in this case ID: 8-7390000039423.
Please check your email and look for your case number 8-7390000039423.
If you have further questions, you may ask through the email thread. This will help us focus on one case and avoid confusion. Please refrain from creating new chat sessions to avoid multiple cases.
Thank you for your time and consideration, Leigh. Sadly, in my case, I have real evidence of youtube employee misconduct:
Quote,
"Please know that all content is reviewed against our Community Guidelines by a combination of trained human reviewers and automated systems to ensure fairness and consistency. These decisions are made based on the content itself, not on any personal factors."
This is just not true.
I understand that your job may be to pretend that it is true, but my case really does provide incontrovertible proof that this is not true.
I understand. Let me transfser your chat to my supervisor. They will get back to you here on chat shortly.
Please stay connected.
Thank you.
You’re connected with agent Victoria. [11:40 PM]
Hi! My name is Victoria, and I'm a manager here with the YouTube Support experience team. How are you doing today?
Hello, Victoria. I am having a perfectly delightful day.
That's good to hear.
I am happy to answer any questions you may have, but I assume you need a few moments to read the (copious) text leading up to this point.
I'm reading your previous interaction with our representative,
Just to confirm, you to speak with a higher-level manager regarding their channel’s history of being deleted and reinstated.
You believe YouTube employee misconduct may have affected their case and want direct escalation, as previously promised in an earlier conversation.
Is that correct?
No: it is possible I misunderstand you, and it is possible that you have misunderstood me, too.
I'm sorry for the confusion.
Are you referring to the warning for a strike on your channel?
I will use the word mysterious here, intentionally:
over a period of more than one year
a series of MYSTERIOUS censorship decisions have been made against my youtube channel.
Several of these MYSTERIOUS decisions have happened within the last few days.
Several of these MYSTERIOUS decisions happened (approximately) one year ago.
They are allegations of hate speech that are flagrantly wrong: attempts to appeal or even discuss the details of these decisions (with youtube management representatives like yourself) have had MYSTERIOUS results.
That is my succinct synopsis of the situation.
I see.
To avoid confusion can you please tell exactly on what do I need to check?
Quoting conversation 4-1747000039900, for example, about events that transpired within the last 48 hours…
Quote, "Just to inform you, our internal team didn't provide any timestamp on the videos and the specific reason why it was removed."
So that is regarding the warning that you received on your channel.
Is what I need to check?
No.
The situation is more extreme than that.
More dangerous.
Please tell me exactly on what do I need to check.
So that I can assist you accordingly.
Are we still chatting?
(1) My channel already was deleted (banned) for "hate speech" one year ago. All three of the videos ("three strikes") used to justify that decision are still banned today. Every single one of these decisions was MYSTERIOUS: very obviously, none of the videos contain hate speech. If you look at the timestamp, etc., there has (evidently) been flagrant employee misconduct.
The youtube employees did not enforce community standards: youtube employees have been intentionally violating the rules (falsely claiming these videos contain hate speech, manipulating the system from within).
(2) This is happening again right now, with a series of videos being banned within the last three days.
(3) Higher levels of management need to look at the evidence for each and every one of these videos and actually reverse the decision to ban the videos.
Thanks for those information.
And, furthermore, (4) we need to prevent this from happening again.
It is now happening for the second time in (approximately) one year, as already described.
Just to confirm, you want me to check the community guidelines strikes on your channel?
Is that your main concern?
No.
No, I do not think that is a reasonable summary on your part, Victoria.
Sorry for the confusion.
I'm not the one who does the review for a violation but I can check on what are the options you can do to resolve this and how to prevent this.
Please give me five minutes.
I think you need to speak to an even higher level of management about a serious problem of employee misconduct within youtube.
In my case, I can really prove that many videos (at least six) that do not contain hate speech have been intentionally flagged as "hate speech" by youtube employees.
That is the problem. And it is an ongoing problem, threatening my channel with deletion right now.
Thank you for your patience. I just wanted to check in—are you still with me? [11:59 PM]
I am still with you, and I am actively putting together the list of links to the banned videos concerned.
Thanks.
I need more time to check this.
Please give me another 5 minutes.
Each one of these decisions about "hate speech" needs to be investigated and overturned. There is palpable evidence of intentional youtube employee misconduct involved. These are not just accidents. These are not examples of incompetence.
Sept. 25th, 2025
https://youtu.be/ZlHEEbYyzaQ
MONK MODE! @Hamza97
Sept 24th, 2025
https://youtu.be/xdEhTXBU_KI
I'm still too ugly to lead the vegan movement.
Sept 24th, 2025
https://youtube.com/live/82zFz7lx7Oo
Stop saying, "dating is a numbers game". #blackpill #incels
Sept 24th, 2025
https://youtu.be/oDmp7KyD71I
Blackpilled Incels: Refugees from the Toxic Optimism of Christianity
Thanks again for your patience while I looked into this. Are you still there?
I'm still here, and I'm happy to wait.
Sorry for the wait.
Please give me another 5 minutes.
Those are the most recent four examples of totally false allegations of hate speech from Youtube employees:
the allegations (circa) Oct 1st, 2024, are also demonstrably false.
I have already uploaded a youtube video showing the timestamps that the (false) allegations of hate speech indicate (from that Oct 1st, 2024 era).
This is a very serious case of intentional misconduct on the part of youtube employees: anyone in management who is willing to consider the evidence will understand the nature of the problem.
Thanks again for your patience while I looked into this. Are you still there?
The final example mentioned from September 24th of 2025 (https://youtu.be/oDmp7KyD71I) is discussing the type of university education you would need to get a job as an English teacher in Japan, and this is contrasted to the experience of another youtuber (who wanted to be an English teacher but could not get this kind of job). That is the discussion at the timestamp 00:03:23.
It is totally impossible that someone sincerely misinterpreted this as hate speech.
Sorry for the wait and thanks for those information.
Upon checking, you already have contacted us regarding this and one of my co manager has already consulted this to our internal team.
There was also an email that was sent to you regarding this.
Let me share the information again with you.
After reviewing the videos, we determined that they violate our Community Guidelines.
While we aim to allow a wide range of content, hate speech is not permitted on YouTube. Our policy prohibits content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on protected group status, as outlined here: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939.
Examples of hate speech include dehumanization, use of slurs or harmful stereotypes, claims of inferiority, or conspiracy theories targeting protected groups. In some cases, limited exceptions are made for content with sufficient educational, documentary, artistic, or scientific context.
Following our review, we removed the video under our Hate Speech policies because it contained content that praised or glorified violence against individuals or groups based on these protected attributes.
[Dear reader: you have just been reminded of the particular videos called into question. Do any of them "praise violence" against people "based on these protected attributes"? Does the parody song "Monk Mode" praise or glorify violence?]
We hope you understand that these actions are intended to keep the YouTube community safe. For more details, you can review our Hate Speech policy here: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939
Evidently, Victoria, I need to speak to someone at a higher level of management.
You are just copying and pasting information that was already in emails sent to me.
One of the managers here and there is no more escalations that we can do here.
Here are the links to the earlier examples of banned videos.
Oct 1st, 2024
https://youtu.be/6g8Yn0wnsKE
Genetically inferior, morally inferior, intellectually inferior.
September 30th, 2024
https://youtu.be/YEp8rbvbzpg
The Last PUA in Japan: Tkyosam's Deleted Videos.
September 27th, 2024
https://youtu.be/F0pac_Y9ItE
She is not an Anastasia: Hamza Ahmed's new girlfriend is a Jessica.
Even though the titles may sound provocative, you can see what was actually said at each of the timestamps in THIS VIDEO, discussing the case, proving that none of the videos contained hate speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcgy9PNWAEA
This was also been escalated by one of my co managers.
I can see that you also replied to that email.
Let me ask you, Victoria, why do you think my channel was banned an [sic] unbanned?
Please wait for the response of my co manager for your email.
I am afraid that we do not have further specifics of the review. We recommend that you familiarize yourself with the community guidelines policy - (https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9288567?hl=en&sjid=6505435379497266163-AP) so it would be easier for you to determine whether your content is aligned with our policies or not.
Why do you think someone at youtube decided to reverse the decision, after my channel had been banned?
At least one person in youtube management decided that a terrible mistake had been made.
I'm a partner:
I earn money from youtube.
I get adsense revenue.
All of that was stopped.
All of that started again.
Why?
MYSTERIOUS, isn't it?
We are always here to help you.
I am asking you to help right now.
That is why you can appeal if you got a violation.
If your channel was terminated before and you filed an appeal that means that your appeal got approved.
I'm sorry if I do not have the details for the review.
That's not true, is it? [This was said in reply to the statement about the appeal process, above: the normal appeal process was not followed —not at all— just as the normal "three strike" process was not followed before it.]
Re: "That is why you can appeal if you got a violation."
So what is the help I am now asking for?
I'm sorry but your appeal got rejected.
My co manager had already filed an appeal on your behalf.
Right. So what is the help I am asking for.
What is the situation I am in now.
Please wait for the response of my co manager for your issue. We have received the email that you have sent us.
Please understand that reaching out to multiple different agents won't speed up your resolution. In fact, it often slows things down because we have to spend time sorting through duplicate cases and figuring out which team is handling the official review.
What happens if there are dishonest and immoral people working within Youtube?
What happens if I can prove there is zero "hate speech" in a video (more than six videos now) but youtube employees are intentionally lying about "hate speech"?
What if I can prove that these are false allegations?
What if the enforcement system is rigged?
[As a digression, I should note: the allegation of hate speech is —specifically— that these videos "glorified violence against protected groups", which is even more surreal when you consider how heterogenous the accused videos now are. If the parody song "Monk Mode" (sung to the tune of the 1964 song "My Girl" by the Temptations) is supposedly glorifying violence (against an unspecified racial minority) is it really possible that the same allegation of glorifying violence is equally true when directed at the livestream discussing the university credentials required to become an English teacher in Japan?]
Echoing back the same with you might not be something you’d be happy to hear. But you deserve clarity to make sure your expectations are met.
I'll be sending you an email at [email address omitted] about the interaction we had within 24 hours. I'll be closing this chat and I hope you have a safe day ahead.
Thanks for contacting YouTube. Have a great day. [12:21 AM]
